Daily Archives: September 8, 2007

Patent Sense

Today’s New York Times reports that House Passes Bill to Curb Suits by Patent Owners:

The House approved the most sweeping changes to United States patent law in more than half a century on Friday in a victory for computer companies like Microsoft and finance companies like Goldman Sachs.

The legislation, approved 220 to 175, would make patents harder to obtain and easier to challenge and is intended to curtail litigation by limiting where patent owners can file suit and how much they can collect in damages.

The measure passed by the House would change the rules at the Patent and Trademark Office so patents would go to the first person to file an application, not necessarily the first inventor. That would limit years-long disputes over who was the first to invent new technology and would bring the United States in line with other countries’ patent rules. It would also allow third parties to introduce evidence against applications and would create a system, called post-grant opposition, to challenge new patents.

In litigation, it would limit where patent suits could be filed so that cases are not concentrated in court districts deemed favorable to plaintiffs, create a new way to calculate damages to reflect the contribution of the invention to the overall product and allow immediate appeals of court rulings on the interpretation of patent terms while cases are proceeding.

While many of us have often heard or used the phrase “patent nonsense” this is an instance of “patent sense,” a sensible proposal that I hope goes on to become law.

I know that many open-source developers have strong feelings against patents. I’ve never had such strong opinions on this, though it does seem to me that the pendulum has swung too far in the past few years by allowing the creation of “business process” patents that are “patent nonsense,” thus encouraging the accumulation of patents by companies, known as “patent trolls,” that exist solely to enforce their patents and profit by the threat of litigation. This proposed legislation is I hope a sign that the pendulum is moving back to a more sensible location.

By the way, the article does contain an interesting part about the value of the intellectual property involved, suggesting to me why there are so many trolling these murky waters:

Intense lobbying has surrounded the issue, reflecting the importance of patents to the American economy. Intellectual property in the United States, dominated by patents, is valued at as much as $5.5 trillion, more than 40 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product, according to a 2005 study by USA for Innovation, a Washington group that advocates free trade.

It’s worth noting that several billions of dollars worth of that intellectual property is freely available to anyone interested to use as they see fit and at no cost — all the open-source packages available today, including in particular Linux and my own favorite form of Linux, Ubuntu.

On Choosing the Title of a Blog Post

A blog post has two parts: the title and the body, the writing that follows the title.

I wrote in an earlier post, In twenty-five words or less, that, “The most important words are the title. It is your first and only chance to get the reader’s attention. You want to give them a reason to read the first paragraph.”

These words hold true, but to make your post more effective you also need to think — carefully — of search engines such as Google:

Pick a title that contains the key elements of the search string that summarizes the subject of your post.

It is the “hits” on this and related search terms that will lead people to your blog.

See for example Configuring Intel 845G video chipset on Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn desktop. This post is about some problems I had installing Ubuntu on an old Aptiva desktop and my success in resolving them. I wanted to share that experience and so picked a title that would show up in searches. For example, that post is the first post returned on “Configuring Intel 845G video chipset on Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn desktop”. That is no surprise. But it is also the first result returned by Google on “Intel 845G video chipset on Ubuntu,” the third on “Intel 845G Ubuntu,” a string that captures the essence of what I was writing about, and the tenth on a search for just “845g.”

That post is currently the most read post so far today, and has been among my most-viewed posts many days since I wrote it, since I am not the only one who has had problems with Intel’s 845G chipset and Ubuntu.

There is one caveat, however. Once you pick the title of a post you don’t want to change it. For example, I titled a recent post The FSL License: Fun Software License. Only minutes after publishing it I realized a better title would have been “The Fun Software License (FSL).”

You can’t go back. As soon as you publish a post it goes out to the folks who use RSS to read your blog. If you change the title, then they will get “404” errors when they try to read it using the URL that was sent out. In the case of WordPress, they will see a message, “Easy, tiger. This is a 404 page.You are totally in the wrong place. Do not pass GO; do not collect $200.”

You can, however, change the content of the post once it has been published; for example, to fix grammatical and layout errors, though in a spirit of fairness you need to maintain the integrity of the post as first published.

So choose the title carefully. Make it catchy, and searchable. But understand that you need to get it right the first time.

  • Pages

  • September 2007
    M T W T F S S
  • RSS The Wayward Word Press

  • Recent Comments

    daveshields on SPITBOL for OSX is now av…
    Russ Urquhart on SPITBOL for OSX is now av…
    Sahana’s Respo… on A brief history of Sahana by S…
    Sahana’s Respo… on A brief history of Sahana by S…
    James Murray on On being the maintainer, sole…
  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

  • Top Posts

  • Top Rated

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Top Rated